Financial Health

Women-owned businesses categorized as “non-essential” during Covid

Women-owned businesses categorized as “non-essential” during Covid

I just finished my reliable revenue forecasting course with a lesson in there on how to look at demographic data for your business. Looking at demographic data always highlights for me the discrepancy between women-owned businesses and male-owned businesses. Interestingly enough, the government’s response to Covid-19 exacerbated an already touchy issue. Here is just one report by the US Chamber of Commerce discussing this change of events.

The report highlights that:

  • Male-owned businesses feeling “good” dropped by 5 points while female owned businesses feeling “good” dropped by 13 points

  • There are a lower number of women owned businesses compared to male-owned businesses to start with.

    • Which means that of the smaller population of women owned businesses an even greater percentage of the total was having trouble.

Let’s talk about why…

Businesses that were ruled as “non-essential” seemed to be predominately in industries with a greater population of female entrepreneurs like: health and fitness centers, spa and esthetician services, hair salons, etc. Taking that into consideration, I want to specifically compare the decision to categorize marijuana businesses as essential compared to health and fitness studios. Businesses that sell marijuana in California under governor Newsom were allowed to continue operating because of the health benefits they provided. Interestingly enough there is arguably MORE research supporting the health benefits of exercise but those businesses were shut-down as non-essential. Why is that?

Well, there was a lack of evidence to support that research was used to categorize businesses as essential or non-essential. Since politicians were making the decisions, we can assume that the decisions were then politically driven. And since women make up a smaller percentage of total politicians (https://cawp.rutgers.edu/current-numbers) we can assume that women were outnumbered in the decision making process.

Going forward, I hope there is more transparency on the decision making processes that impact the ability for women to operate profitable businesses. One way for there to be more transparency is for women owned businesses to understand and have confidence in their finances. This is what I help with. I help women learn professional methods for managing their money so that they can have confidence in the future of their business and easily explain it to anyone who doubts their ability.

Share this if it resonated with you!

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

Don’t make business decisions based on how you THINK they may impact taxes

Don’t make business decisions based on how you THINK they may impact taxes

During one of my roles at a large multinational corporation, my business partners asked me to look into the tax benefits of donating material. You see, the team had already bought the material (so it was already expensed, aka “written-off” for tax purposes) but they did not need to use it anymore. They wanted to know if there was any reason for them to donate the material as opposed to just throwing it away. Throwing the material away would be easier so they were looking for an incentive to donate the material.

Since I am a business financial planner, I create and analyze financial budgets and forecasts compared to actual results, I reached out to a tax accountant for an answer. Similarly, in a corporate world, a tax accountant would not answer questions from business partners on planning out the financial impact of future business decisions. Those questions would be deferred to me.

When I reached out to a tax accountant I explained the situation and he answered that since the material had already been written-off (or expensed) there was no further tax benefit that could be gained. When something is expensed then the full value of the item is reduced from taxable income, simplified meaning: you don’t pay taxes on it. Then he said something which embodies so much of what we KNOW in corporate finance but that is not well-known to the average person outside of finance:

Please tell your business partners not to make any business decisions based on how they think it will impact taxes.

Why did he say that? The short of it is that taxes are complicated and a good tax accountant can do your taxes well whether you are making billions of dollars in profit or negative profit. Companies who are making BILLIONS of dollars in profit are paying a relatively small amount in taxes and are using the same tax code that you are as a small business owner. That means that the tax savings are in the tax code and are not based on the business decisions you make. You should make business decisions based on what is best for growing and improving your business not based on how you think it might impact taxes.

And it is something your tax accountant should be saying to you. Similarly to what highly paid tax accountants for large corporations say to their business partners.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

Amazon's profits increased amid an economically devastating pandemic

Amazon's profits increased amid an economically devastating pandemic

Amazon recently released in a current report Form 8-K(1) on February 2nd, 2021, that Jeff Bezos “plans to transition to the role of Executive Chair in the third quarter of 2021” and that “Andrew R. Jassy, currently CEO Amazon Web Services, will succeed Mr. Bezos as Amazon’s Chief Executive Officer and President in the third quarter of 2021.” This was unexpected news no doubt and worth a lot of attention.

In that same report, however, the company also announced record breaking sales and a higher profitability margin amid an economically devastating pandemic.

Amazon’s sales increased 38% in 2020 and its net income increased about 84%. To give context on how exceptional this was, the S&P 500 generated around 11-12% average annual returns from 1926-2019. So in a non-pandemic year we would expect on average for profitable corporations to generate a return of about 11-12%. So an 84% increase in net income is very very high compared to the average.

On top of that the United States expected real GDP decreased by -3.5% in 2020, compared to an increase of +2.2% in 2019. This means that in 2020 there was lower total wealth available to go around in the U.S. compared to 2019. We might assume from Amazon’s earnings then that a higher percentage of total wealth in the United States went to Amazon.

On the flip side, many small business owners and the people who work for those businesses have had a tremendously tough year. In some cases losing their life’s savings and their life’s work through no fault of their own and purely as a direct result from this pandemic. It’s hard to find a data driven prediction but I am estimating that something like 30% of small businesses across the country either have or expect to have to shut their doors for good. Government intervention destroyed small businesses and funneled customers and sales towards big tech companies like Amazon.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

Additional Fee Charged by Tax Filing Software Providers

Additional Fee Charged by Tax Filing Software Providers

Intuit may have been able to increase revenue per customer by charging more customers a “Refund Processing Service Fee3 of $40**. Intuit’s description of this fee is: “The Refund Processing Service is an option for paying your TurboTax fee by deducting it from your federal tax refund. It's a convenient way to pay for TurboTax if you don't have (or don't want to use) your credit or debit card.” 4 A $40 fee for the convenience of staying seated and not being able to enter another payment method seems expensive.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

Can non-essential businesses re-negotiate contracts because of the Government’s response to COVID-19?

Can non-essential businesses re-negotiate contracts because of the Government’s response to COVID-19?

What options do small businesses have then? According to a lawyer I recently spoke to there may be an option to negotiate existing contractual obligations using “impossibility of contract”. Impossibility of contract may be interpreted that, given an impossible market driven event the contract is now void and unenforceable. One should consult with a lawyer to determine eligibility, the cost of which will hopefully will be less than the downstream negative effects of halting and/or diminishing operations.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

Make Timely Mortgage Payments Even with CARES Act Relief Options

Make Timely Mortgage Payments Even with CARES Act Relief Options

On April 6th, 2020 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau updated their blog article titled Guide to Coronavirus Mortgage Relief Options.”1 This article recommends that “if you can pay your mortgage, pay your mortgage” and if you can’t pay your mortgage you may qualify for a “protection” under the Corona Virus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act. The article specifies that the provisions are limited in scope and it does not imply that participants will be protected from a negative mark on their credit history or FICO Score if they are late for a mortgage payment.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin